WPC) <+:2w(wYw@pb224, M2և1}bIƥ{f@;h@ l.=0S{6hpblOV,A:wD;ȖKngu˚p)y&+>x YO1Z@"G+{UW#kרv߈̨gda 4k-syۚNy6ߜcy.c9 GHʍdwO9X(ih$H|y#텠+$ڿI 忺O4d*m=A:m?CLSIY]9C~h=@!+mX(5`oFz{V+i8:Kl"mH^)Q: Z\I5(BX5Q tAur$# UN %% 0(+ U S ^ s w 4   m  0l_ 0D jUNyU> B P"rrrrr zE jBrother MFC-6800 USB,,,,,,,,0(A Z6Times New Roman Regular($(\  `63 fO1:i+003|xU  $    1    _ԀAllfurtherrulereferencesaretotheCaliforniaRulesofCourt.((3$ !      0  (#$  0  New Jersey v. Natale (N.J. 8/2/05) 2005 N.J. Lexis 9(Fa  Z6Times New Roman Regular\  `&Times New Roman dPeople v. Black (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1238  !  _NewJerseyv._Natale_Ԁ(N.J.8/2/05)2005N.J.Lexis938#i.#zNew Jersey v. Natale (N.J. 8/2/05) 2005 N.J. Lexis 9CASESNew Jersey v. Natale (N.J. 8/2/05) 2005 N.J. Lexis 9 !  _ @INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA   @*   p PEOPLEOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA,  )SupremeCourtNo._____    PlaintiffandRespondent, h   0  )(#(#    `     h     )CourtofAppeal      `  v.   h     )No._xxxxxx_        `     h     )      `    , h 0  0(#(#)SuperiorCourt (#(#   DefendantandAppellant. h     )No._xxxxxx_   򀀀)0 p  p(#p(# ̀APPEALFROMTHESUPERIORCOURTOF_xxxxxxx_ԀCOUNTY   ̀TheHonorable_xxxxxxx_,JudgePresiding#  +## J#      ` _________________________________     # #  PETITIONFORREVIEWTOEXHAUST  STATEREMEDIES $ (CALIFORNIARULESOFCOURT,RULE33.3)  ##   H    ` _________________________________ l      `     h #  3## Ι#  TOTHEHONORABLERONALDGEORGE,CHIEFJUSTICE,ANDTOTHE l HONORABLEASSOCIATEJUSTICESOFTHECALIFORNIASUPREMECOURT:  l     Pursuanttorules28and33.3oftheCaliforniaRulesofCourt,_XXXXXXX_, "l defendantandappellant,respectfullypetitionsthiscourtforreviewofthe[un/]published $l opinionbytheFourthDistrict,DivisionXXX,[ifpublished,providecitation],which &l!! affirmsthejudgment,filed_xxxx_.AcopyoftheopinionoftheCourtofAppealis (l## attachedtothispetitionasAppendixA.(Cal.RulesofCourt,rule28.1(b)(4).)  #  1       *l%%   PETITIONFORREHEARING      AlthoughapetitionforrehearingcouldhavebeenfiledintheCourtofAppeal,  neitherpartyfiledsuchapetition.(Rule28.1(b)(3).)[Or,ifapetitionwasfiled,sostate  andindicatehowthecourtruled.]      @ STATEMENTUNDERRULE33.3       Thiscasepresentsnogroundsforreviewunderrule28(b)andthepetitionisfiled   solelytoexhauststateremediesforfederalhabeascorpuspurposes.(OSullivanv.   _Boerckel_(1999)526U.S.838[119_S.Ct_.1728,144_L.Ed_.2d1].)    STATEMENTOFTHEUNDERLYINGPROCEEDINGS      [Provideabriefstatementofthecase,includingthenatureoftheconvictionand  thepunishmentimposed.(Rule33.3(b)(3)(B).)]    STATEMENTOFTHEFACTUALANDLEGALBASESOFTHECLAIM      AppellantsclaimisthatthetrialcourtviolatedappellantsSixthandFourteenth  Amendmentrightsassetforthin_Blakely_Ԁv.Washington(2004)542U.S.296[124_S.Ct_.  2531,159_L.Ed_.2d403]andUnitedStatesv.Booker(2005)___U.S.___[125_S.Ct_.738,   160_L.Ed_.2d621]byimposingtheupperterm[and/orconsecutivesentences]basedon " factorsthatwerenotfoundtruebeyondareasonabledoubtbyajury[oradmittedby $  appellant].AppellantrecognizesthiscourtsrecentholdinginPeoplev.Black(2005)35 &"" Cal.4th1238,1244: thejudicial_factfinding_Ԁthatoccurswhenajudgeexercisesdiscretion ($$ toimposeanuppertermsentenceorconsecutivetermsunderCalifornialawdoesnot *&& implicateadefendantsSixthAmendmentrighttoajurytrial,andasksthiscourtto ,(( revisittheissue.    #  Ν ## #Eventhoughthiscasedoesnotpresentagroundforreliefunderrule28(b),it  warrantsreview.Appellantrequeststhiscourtexerciseitsdiscretionandgrantreviewto  reconsideritsconclusionsetforthinBlack.(AdvisoryCom.com.,WestAnn.Codes,   Rules(2005ed.)_foll_.rule33.3,p.86.) Ԁ#  #Since y Black,atleastonestate,withasentencing   schemeverymuchlikeCalifornias,hascalled y Blackintoquestion,byfindingsentences   aboveapresumptivestatutorytermbasedonjudicialfactfindingviolatethejurytrial   guarantee.(  NewJerseyv.  _Natale_Ԁ(N.J.8/2/05)2005N.J.Lexis938,*12,*4446.)# #   Ԁ#  c#The  courtheldthatasentenceabovethepresumptivestatutoryterm,basedsolelyonajudicial  findingofaggravatingfactors,violatesadefendantsjurytrialguarantee.(Id.at*  12.)  TheNewJerseySupremeCourtevennotedthatCaliforniasdeterminatesentencinglaw  appearedtobeindirectconflictwiththefederalconstitution.(Id.a  t*24.)    And,almostallotherstatecourtsexaminingtheirsentencingstatuteshavereached  similarconclusions,findingsuchschemesviolatethejurytrialguarantee.  (Lopezv.  People(Colo.2005)113P.3d713,728;Statev.Hughes(2005)154_Wn_.2d118[110P.3d   192]_Smylie_Ԁv.State(Ind.2005)823N.E.2d679,681685;Statev._Dilts_Ԁ(2004)337Ore. " 645,654[103P.3d95];Statev._Shattuck_Ԁ(Minn.2004)689N.W.2d785(per_curiam_ $  order);Statev.Brown(2004)209Ariz.200,202204[99P.3d15];butseeStatev. &"" Gomez(Tenn.2005)163S.W.3d632,658.)#  a#   ($$ #  ^ #  # D# Ԁ#  ε ## #  A. ` FACTUALBACKGROUND *&&   [Provideabriefstatementofthefactsunderlyingtheclaimandwhichentitle ,(( appellanttorelief.Thefactssetforthintheopeningbriefcanbeimportedhereor,for  purposesofthispetitiononly,thefactualbackgroundsetforthintheCourtofAppeal  opinioncanbeadopted.(Rule33.3(b)(3)(C).)]    B. ` LEGALERROR     [Provideabriefstatementofthelegalargumentsoftheclaim.Theargumentset   forthintheopeningbriefcanbeimportedhere.Besuretoincludeareferencetothe   SixthandFourteenthAmendmentrightsandthediscussionsthereofin_Blakely_and   Bookerforfederalizationpurposes.(Rule33.3(b)(3)(C).)]    C. ` CONCLUSION    Forthereasonssetforthabove,thiscourtshouldexerciseitsdiscretionandgrant  review.  Date:  _XXXXXXX_    h   RespectfullySubmitted,     `     h   ____________________     `     h   _XXXXXXXXX_    CERTIFICATIONOFWORDCOUNT       I,_XXXX_,certifythat,basedonthewordcountofthecomputerprogramusedto ! preparethisdocument,thereare_XXXX_Ԁwordsinthisopeningbrief,excludingthetables. # (Cal.RulesofCourt,rule28.1(d)(1).) %!!     IdeclareunderpenaltyofperjuryunderthelawsoftheStateofCaliforniathatthe '## foregoingistrueandcorrect.Executedat_XXXX_,California. )%% Dated:_XXXXXXXXX_  0 h ________________________  +''h(#h(#    `     h _XXXXX_#  n)## '#