WPC #[N^~N*npg+\èq]Ql,:jIEĄCsUpYiL1eo+l6Nܢ/jzX$|9ׁwg&nj[Miةnգ)esY1 ?>4Y96懬t.HÏ y5Z#_VGB^;>h ddsLa@mbe y%H"Ih\q^wUkXJN:"^agaSƳz4D#^ғ 3_J2i5R۹hCk9DfƘmxzGO]&zD*{S㘛a(wzŏ8&'Vh'+:۸_& =ȧLdaoٞ_ +dS#zUNC % 0(U>U2U @/U8oN^ w4 mA 0D>Brother MFC-6800 USB,,,,,,,,0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($\  `&Times New Roman& qZ Marigold (I Z(Times New Roman (\  ` TmsRmn 8ptS263 fO1:i+003|xU  7 '  _(3$ !  !  _X  X  XXXXXX    SAMPLESUPPLEMENTALBRIEFINGLETTER V FOLLOWINGTRANSFERFROMSUPREMECOURTTO_COA_ T x0vxQvvx0LETTERHEAD R #x0vvxQx##vx0Y#@@*Dp D# p##-#_    `    _[Date]     CourtofAppeal   FourthAppellateDistrict,Division[Number]   Attn:[ClerksName]   [Address]   0  Re:RequesttoFileSupplementalBriefandSupplementalOpeningBriefinPeoplev.   [Name],CourtofAppealNo.[Number](#(# Dear[ClerksName]:    [Briefsummaryofcasesproceduralstatuse.g., On**,theCaliforniaSupreme  CourttransferredthiscasebacktotheCourtofAppealforfurtherproceedingsinlightof  Peoplev.Black(2005)35Cal.4th1238(Black).##]PursuanttoCaliforniaRulesofCourt,  rule13(b)(1),appellantrespectfullyrequeststhiscourttoacceptthisletterasasupplemental  openingbrief.#)#    Initsopinionfiledon****,andasarguedinappellants[opening/supplemental  opening]brief,thiscourtfoundthatimpositionoftheuppertermbasedonjudicialfact  findingviolatedappellantsfederalconstitutionalrightstoajurytrialandproofbeyonda  reasonabledoubt,undertheSixthandFourteenthAmendmentsand_Blakely_Ԁv.Washington  (2004)542U.S.296[124S.Ct.2531,159L.Ed.2d403](_Blakely_).OnJune20,2005,the  CaliforniaSupremeCourtdecidedPeoplev.Black,supra,35Cal.4th1238,holdingthatthere   isnofederalconstitutionalrighttoajurytrialonfactfindingrelatingtoaggravatingfactors ! usedtoimposeanuppertermunderCaliforniasDeterminateSentencingLaw.TheSupreme " CourtremandedappellantscasetothiscourtforfurtherproceedingsinlightofBlack. #  AppellantacknowledgesthiscourtisboundbytheSupremeCourtsrulinginBlackunder $!! AutoEquitySales,Inc.v.SuperiorCourt(1962)57Cal.2d450. %""   However,thisacknowledgmentisnotaconcessionastothemeritsofappellants '$$ argument.Appellantcontinuestomaintainthatthesentencingviolatedhisfederal (%% constitutionalrights.(See,e.g.,NewJerseyv._Natale_Ԁ(August2,2005)___N.J.___,2005 )&& N.J.LEXIS938,*24[findingsentencingschemeverylikeCaliforniasviolates_Blakely_and *'' rejectingCaliforniasapproachinBlackbecauseitappearstobeindirectconflictwith +(( _Blakely_];accordasto_Blakely_violations,Lopezv.People(Colo.2005)113P.3d713,728; ,)) Statev.Hughes(2005)154_Wn_.2d118[110P.3d192]_Smylie_Ԁv.State(Ind.2005)823 -** N.E.2d679,681685;Statev._Dilts_Ԁ(2004)337Ore.645,654[103P.3d95];Statev._Shattuck_ .++ (Minn.2004)689N.W.2d785(per_curiam_Ԁorder);Statev.Brown(2004)209Ariz.200,202 /,, 204[99P.3d15];butseeStatev.Gomez(Tenn.2005)163S.W.3d632,658).[He/she]also 0-- continuestourgethiscourttocorrecttheconstitutionalviolation.(SeeOSullivanv.   _Boerckel_Ԁ(1999)526U.S.838,844845[119_S.Ct_.1728,144_L.Ed_.2d1][stateprisoner   seekingfederalhabeascorpusreliefmustgivestatecourtafairopportunitytoacton   claims].)#F#   Respectfullysubmitted,   [AttorneyName]   StateBarNo.[number]   AttorneyforAppellant   [AppellantsName]#4#