WPC E'+xaH!gym\lwL]F:W0|:x.[(֠%SNlJih6 X(=+5ijH>oYJ;e45 )f)ڥb6#FK8W>h=7.۪ɤSj"ྈ]9WK,j 5V8 -h,M\k>Г(XwA+oai4n(Vx?j_iUvMqL ^%3˞<52)Ed*Uu'rr֚=ā<(Er 1$sY.6pގ,:nʌ4_%)Gm,?Pґ@ZH N+5MsCq_0|_8p ~TRYFiCaypWwGuvFl׎DO)3\;.|vW#UN % 0( U> 1uE E E ^ w 4 0l 0DJ   m 72 N 0c M M M M M M 1 BBrother MFC-6800 USB,,,,,,,,0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($\  `&Times New Roman3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)}4 K3orel0((3$ !      0  (#$  0  3|xUi)(;3$2#  0  .3  0     $    1    _ԀXXBlakelyv.Washington(2004)542U.S.296[124S.Ct.2531,159L.Ed.2d  Ѐ403];andUnitedStatesv.Booker(2005)543U.S.220[125S.Ct.738,  Ѐ160L.Ed.2d621].AppellantacknowledgesthattheCaliforniaSupreme  ЀCourtsdecisioninPeoplev.Black(2005)35Cal.4th1238,#X8XX#XX8holdingthat򀀀  ЀBlakelydoesnotinvalidatetheCaliforniasentencingschemeastothechoice  ЀofanuppertermorconsecutivesentencingisbindingauthorityinthisCourt.   ЀAppellantraisesthisclaimheretopreserveitforreview.(hCEKQW]cioAutoList7IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII d !  _XX"3"  3J2#  1  .3  0    IMPOSITIONOFTHEUPPERTERMVIOLATED3Jz݌(#(# Ќ    APPELLANTSFEDERALCONSTITUTIONALRIGHTSTO  0  PROOFBEYONDAREASONABLEDOUBTANDAJURYTRIAL  PURSUANTTO_BLAKELY_ANDBOOKERBECAUSETHE  AGGRAVATINGFACTORSWERENOTFOUNDBYAJURY . @  #  1      (#(#   Whenthecourtsentencedappellanttotheuppertermoffouryearsforhis   convictionofsection245(a)(1),thejudgesaiditwasbaseduponseveralcircumstances   inaggravation,namelythatthecrimewasa vicious,cowardlyact,thevictimwas   vulnerable,andthecrimeshowedthatplanningwasinvolved.(4RT_486.) x  _    ##  Asnotedinfootnote1,thiscourtispresentlyboundbyCaliforniaSupremeCourt   precedent.However,giventherecentgrantofcertiorariinCunninghamv.California,   No.056551,cert.granted,February21,2006,appellantpresentstheissueandshall   requesttofilesupplementalbriefingifandwhenanyfavorabledecisionissuesbefore   finalityofthisappeal.    F(h83 #X8X+#