WPCO 7 866H,^f!Fx)v!l>K65>QGEs;d5V<Bmce=t# Tf㋲`LjT0B#'G& ]ǎ]1 W؄,Q2}D=mRKroW:Yɒ-HX"a^ }'Ba 5=bNq$@b#V:L0"Hv{™~ғ%ypbcGP8w=RnMZ}91#[v`[!ĚS K[tiؔ<>[fK#S9}CRb:k&?e+! Ljx.ʟ,p+h](|)7ڨL(mf=kZ4\JC@Ww'3|6"G{ yV# U Nq % 0: UN ^ M wY 4] q   m E f 0V a Bf9a;Brother MFC-7220 USB Printer,,,,0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS.,(Fa  Z6Times New Roman Regularc> /yv=eofAut3|x   U(.3$ !USUS.,  TABLE A dTABLE A !USUS.,  _ XX    INTHECOURTOFAPPEALOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA  FOURTHAPPELLATEDISTRICT  DIVISION 0 @ _________   *Uddd Xdd Xdd X  ,dd , dd +     THEPEOPLEOFTHESTATEOF  Z CALIFORNIA,  Z  PlaintiffandRespondent,  Z  vs.  Z  ̀,  Z  DefendantandAppellant.  Z  ,U Z ,CourtofAppeal  Z No.  Z  SuperiorCourt  Z  No.( Z  U (@*   APPEALFROMTHESUPERIORCOURTOF : ______________COUNTY  8 Honorable_____________________,Judge 6 AU ) dE 5A 6    APPELLANTSMOTIONTOCONSOLIDATE E THEHABEASPROCEEDINGWITHTHEAPPEAL C   / `     h   AU ) dE @A A!  `     h      `     h     AttorneyName P"& 0 ` 0 ` ` 0 0h  0h h 0  StateBarNo.P#'   0 ` 0 ` ` 0 0h  0h h 0  addressP$(   0 ` 0 ` ` 0 0h  0h h 0  phonenumberP% )   0 ` 0 ` ` 0 0h  0h h 0      0 ` 0 ` ` 0 0h  0h h 0  AttorneyforDefendantand P'"+ AppellantP(#,     P*%.   8(XXdd8INTHECOURTOFAPPEALOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA  FOURTHAPPELLATEDISTRICT  DIVISION 0 @ _________     `     h *xUdddd  dd U  x,dd , dd +     THEPEOPLEOFTHESTATEOF  Z CALIFORNIA,  Z  PlaintiffandRespondent,  Z  vs.  Z  ̀,  Z  DefendantandAppellant.  Z  ,U Z ,CourtofAppeal  Z No.  Z  SuperiorCourt  Z  No.( Z  U (@*  APPEALFROMTHESUPERIORCOURTOF : ______________COUNTY  8 Honorable_____________________,Judge 6 }  򀀀 6  APPELLANTSMOTIONTOCONSOLIDATE 6 THEHABEASPROCEEDINGWITHTHEAPPEAL 4   󀀀 2!    ` TOTHEHONORABLE_____________,PRESIDING 6"$ JUSTICE,ANDTHEHONORABLEASSOCIATEJUSTICESOF 4#% THECOURTOFAPPEAL,FOURTHAPPELLATEDISTRICT, 2$& DIVISION________: 0% '   ` Appellant,_______________,herebymovesforanorder .'~") consolidatingthedirectappeal,casenumber____________,andthe .)~$+ collateralhabeasproceeding,whichisbeinginitiatedbythe .+~&- contemporaneousfilingofapetitionforwritofhabeascorpus,casenumber  ________.Theappellant'sopeningbriefwasfiledon________________.  Thebasisforthismotionismoreparticularlysetforthintheaccompanying  memorandumofpointsandauthoritiesandthedeclarationofappellants   appointedcounsel,_____________________(ExhibitA).   Dated:0 0  h   Respectfullysubmitted,     `     `     h   AttorneyforAppellantandDefendant   `     h      ##@r r  MEMORANDUMOFPOINTSANDAUTHORITIESIN  @ SUPPORTOFCONSOLIDATION  @*  STATEMENTOFCASEANDFACTSSUPPORTING  CONSOLIDATION  @h      (setforthrelevantprocedureandfactswithcitationstotherecordandto   thedeclarationofappellatecounsel)   #C# @)I.     8 ` THEREVIEWINGCOURTHASINHERENTPOWER   ANDBROADDISCRETIONTOCONSOLIDATE   CAUSESINVOLVINGCOMMONISSUESOFFACTOR  LAW.` x` x   ` ThereisnoexpressCaliforniaRuleofCourtgoverningapplications  toconsolidateappeals.However,CaliforniaRulesofCourt#l#Ԁ(hereafter   Rule(s))##,rule8.147(b)_____refers_Ԁtouseofrecordsfrompriorappealson  subsequentappealsinthesamecaseandhasbeeninterpretedinamanner  whichpromotesconsolidationofappeals,unlessitcanbeshownthata  partywouldbeprejudicedbyconsolidation.(GeneralElec.Co.v.Fed.   Etc.,DistributionCo.(1954)122_Cal.App_.2d509,511.) "  ` _Witkin_Ԁisinagreement: $    8 ` Whereseparateactions,relatedinsubjectmatterandissues,are &!" consolidatedfortrial(see4Cal.Proc.(5th##),Pleading,341),or '"# whereactionsseparatelytriedareneverthelesssorelated,they (#$ mayoftenprofitablybeconsideredtogetheronappeal.Sofar )$% asthereviewingcourtisconcerned,itmaywithoutorderplace *%& themonthecalendartogether,makeuseofbriefsandarguments +&' interchangeably,andwriteonlyonedetailedopinion,deciding  theothercasesontheauthorityofthefirst.(Seeinfra,788.)  Anorderofconsolidation,however,goesfurther:itallowsthe  partiestoalltheappealstoprepareasinglerecordandsetof  briefs.` x` x (9_Witkin_,CaliforniaProcedure(5thed.,2008)Appeal,765,p.838.)    ` Underrule8.50(b)oftheCaliforniaRulesofCourt,goodcause   mustbeshown.Certainly,judicialeconomyandpubliceconomyjustifya   conclusionallinterestswouldbebestservedbyanorderconsolidatingthe   appealandhabeasinthisaction,whereidenticalandrelatedissuesare  presentedinadditiontonewissues.Asshowninthedeclarationof  appellatecounsel(ExhibitA),consolidationisappropriatebecauseofthe  relationshipoftheissuesraisedintheappellantsopeningbriefandthe  petitionforwritofhabeascorpus.   `   @% CONCLUSION    ` Fortheforegoingreasons,appellantrequeststhattheopeningbrief  andpetitionforwritofhabeascorpusbeconsolidatedforbriefingand  decision.   Dated:    h   Respectfullysubmitted,    `     h       `     h   AttorneyforAppellantandDefendant      DECLARATIONOF_COUNSEL _  & @`  @  @  @h  @   @@!!" 򀀀     P#(###  ATTACHPROOFOFSERVICE