WPCw YFw?V͋|jfaCvFբ2PfxZV uF75̿2gazJ—Xޥ̆ؐe6~0Q@˅PSPC~*P4) Po辰mqFQAgoB@iV>fp[z #ʒS须0*m>, v\9YI\8#QUFP@΄A9d[c_wS}ֈuUv]+76Hu恮]SBn 칛Rcս[dN%XrWf5+EAۀs CBD96뒾3v(H=Xwkx $Nsg91d⤆*qWul)I}$+W#UN % 0( ^  w 4 + : m< UNS 1 1u( 0c N 0l 0Dn N 72 U> E$ $ 0U& 0{ 0^ 0# 0 0 0N 0 0 0C 0 0 0 09 0 0 0 0 0> 0 0 0~ 0( 0 0j 0 0 0< BZBrother MFC-6800 USB,,,,,,,,0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($c < m5xsing?3|xU(hH  Z6Times New Roman Regular(CEKQW]cioAutoList1i.i.i.i.i.i.i.i.3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)(;3$2#  0  .3  0  ((3$ !      0  (#$  0   i)\  `&Times New Roman*+ (_2623  ..*G+G (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ../%` ` hp x /   *8+8 (_24  ," hp x ,23  ..," hp x ,  *5+5 (_23 ` ) hp x )23  ..) hp x ) ` *2+2 (_22  &hhp x &23  ..&hhp x &  */+/ (_21  #p x #23  ..#p x #  *,+, (_20 h  p x 23  .. p x h *)+) (_19  pp x 23  ..pp x   *&+& (_18   x 23  .. x   *AA (_17  5+ ` hp x 523  Ԁ5+ ` hp x 5  *GG (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ/%` ` hp x /   *88 (_15  ," hp x ,23  Ԁ," hp x ,  *55 (_14 ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ) hp x ) ` *22 (_13  &hhp x &23  Ԁ&hhp x &  *// (_12  #p x #23  Ԁ#p x #  *,, (_11 h  p x 23  Ԁ p x h *)) (_10  pp x 23  Ԁpp x   (&& &_9   x 23  Ԁ x   (AA &_8  5+ ` hp x 523  5+ ` hp x 5  (GG &_7   /%` ` hp x /23  /%` ` hp x /   (88 &_6  ," hp x ,23  ," hp x ,  (55 &_5 ` ) hp x )23  ) hp x ) ` (22 &_4  &hhp x &23  &hhp x &  (// &_3  #p x #23  #p x #  (,, &_2 h  p x 23   p x h ()) &_1  pp x 23  pp x   &&& $_   x 23   x   <:Default Para d !  _XX88Xdd8 [ATTORNEYNAME,BAR#]  [ATTORNEYFIRM]  [FIRM_ADDRESS9]@*_Ԉ  [TELEPHONE]  AttorneyforDefendantandAppellant   @ COURTOFAPPEALFORTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA   @V V FOURTHAPPELLATEDISTRICT    @"DIVISION[NUMBER] # #Ԉ   InreCSUS.,[CHILDSINITIALS]#T#US.,CS.,s.,0 h 0h(#h(#)0(#(#COURTOFAPPEAL (#(#    `     h   )0  No.:[CASE#] (#(# 0  A_Person[s_]ComingUnder0(#(#)(#(#   TheJuvenileCourtLaw0 h 0h(#h(#)0(#(#SUPERIORCOURT(#(# AV) dE A   `     h   )0  No.:[CASE#](#(# CSUS.,[SPECIFICCOUNTY&AGENCY+0  )   p (#(# TITLEUS.,CS.,;CSUS.,# #]#j# US.,CS.,5,0 ` 0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#)(#(#    ` 0 0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#) APPELLANTSMOTION (#(#   PlaintiffandRespondent,0 h 0h(#h(#) TOAUGMENTTHE (#(# ! ! (83 "3"  3 2  v  .3  0     `     h   ) RECORDONAPPEAL 3 @ ݌(#(# Ќ     `     h   ) ANDTOEXTENDTIME   CSUS.,[PARENTSINITIALS ](mother/father )# #US.,CS., ,) FORFILINGTHE      `     h   ) OPENINGBRIEF    __AV) dE A  ObjectorandAppellant.0 h 0h(#h(#) (#(#   TOTHECOURTOFAPPEALANDTOALLPARTIESOFRECORDINTHE   ABOVE-CITEDCASE: "   I. $  REQUESTTOAUGMENTTHERECORDONAPPEAL  % !!   Appellantherebyrequests,pursuanttoCaliforniaRulesofCourt,rules8.340(a) ' ## and(b)and8.408(e),thattherecordonappealbeaugmentedtoincludethefollowing ) %% documents: + ''   1.[DETAILEDDESCRIPTIONOFDOCUMENT0]Thereporterstranscriptof  the[DATE]November6,2003,[SPECIFICHEARING]detentionhearing,[COURT  JUDGE8]beforetheHonorableCynthia_Bashant_,[DEPARTMENT#]inDepartment5,  [COURTREPORTER]withCaroline_Hofeld_Ԁ(#7329),asreporter.[RECORDCITE]The   proceedingsarereferencedintheclerkstranscript,pages356357.[HEARINGTIME.]   Thehearingcommencedatapproximately8:30a.m.andcontinueduntilanunknowntime   onthatday.     2.ThereporterstranscriptoftheJune1,2004,sixmonthstatusreviewhearing,  beforetheHonorableCynthia_Bashant_,inDepartment5,withCaroline_Hofeld_Ԁ(#7329),  asreporter.Theproceedingsarereferencedintheclerkstranscript,pages374376.  Theycommencedatapproximately8:30a.m.andcontinueduntilanunknowntimeon  thatday.    3.ThereporterstranscriptoftheDecember1,2004,12monthreviewhearing,  beforetheHonorableCynthia_Bashant_,inDepartment5,withCaroline_Hofeld_Ԁ(#7329),  asreporter.Theproceedingsarereferencedintheclerkstranscript,pages379380.   Theycommencedatapproximately8:30a.m.andcontinueduntilanunknowntimeon " thatday. $    ($$   BACKGROUND   ;  [REASONADDITIONALDOCUMENTSARENECESSARY.]Theprobable  issueonappealistheproprietyoftheIndianChildWelfareAct(_ICWA_)noticesprovided  totheBlackfootandCherokeetribesandtheBureauofIndianAffairs(BIA).     AtthedetentionhearingheardNovember6,2003,theSanDiegoHealthand   HumanServicesAgency(agency)reportedthatthe_ICWA_Ԁmayapplyandfurtherthat   noticeshadbeensentonthepreviousdaytotheBIAandCherokeetribes.(1C.T.p.8.)   Ѐ[RECORDCITESREQUIREDTHROUGHOUTL.]Thepaternalgrandmotherandfather   werepresentincourt.(2C.T.p.356.)Thecourtdeferredthe_ICWA_Ԁissue.Butatthe  jurisdictionalhearingheldDecember1,2003,thecourtfoundthatthe_ICWA_Ԁdidnot  apply.(2C.T.p.359.)    ThenonJune1,2004,duringthesixmonthstatusreviewhearing,atwhichthe  paternalgrandmotherwaspresent,thecourtagainaddressedthe_ICWA_Ԁandorderedthe  Agencytorenoticethetribes.(2C.T.p.375.)    Atthe12monthstatusreviewhearingheldDecember1,2004,theagency   providedsomenotices,aswellastheresponsestothenoticespreviouslysent.(2C.T.pp. " 218229.)ThecourtdirectedthatallnoticessenttotheCherokeetribesbeprovidedto $  thecourt.(2C.T.p.379.)Thatorderwasreiteratedatthepretrialstatusconferenceheld &!" December27,2004.(2C.T.p.381.) (#$   OnJanuary4,2005,thecourtfoundpropernoticewasprovidedtotheBlackfoot *%& tribeandtheBIA,butnottheCherokeetribe.(2C.T.p.383.)Almostamonthlater,on  January26,2005,thecourtfoundpropernoticewasprovidedtotheCherokeetribe.(2  C.T.p.386.)OnFebruary2,2005,thecourtfoundthatthe_ICWA_Ԁdidnotapplybecause  theagencyreportednotribeshadrespondedtothenotice.(2C.T.p.388.)       @` @@VVMEMORANDUMOFPOINTSANDAUTHORITIES   INSUPPORTOF@@6 6 MOTIONTOAUGMENTTHERECORDONAPPEAL     #  Itiswellsettledthat[_o]n_Ԁappealtheremustbeanadequaterecordtoenablethe   courttopassuponthequestionssoughttoberaised.(Peoplev._Apalatequi_(1978)82   _Cal.App_.3d970,973.)% Further,thiscourthasrepeatedlyaffirmedinrecentyearsthe  importanceofanadequaterecordasoneofthebasictoolsofaneffectiveappeal.(Inre  StevenB.(1979)25Cal.3d1,8;citingMarchv.MunicipalCourt(1972)7Cal.3d422,  423;Peoplev.Barton(1978)21Cal.3d513,518.)    Thetestforaugmentationofthe"normalrecord"inanindigent'sappealisthatan  appellantmustestablish"withsomecertaintyhowthe[additional]materialsherequests  maybeusefultohimonappeal."(Peoplev.Gaston(1978)20Cal.3d476,482;Cal.  RulesofCourt,rule8.404.) !   Anyassertionthatappellanthasnotdemonstrated arguableissuesandthat, # therefore,theaugmentmotionshouldbedeniedisbaseduponthesamereasoningasthe % ! AttorneyGeneralpositedinGaston.Thatreasoningwassoundlycriticizedandrejected '"# bytheCaliforniaSupremeCourt.Thecourtrecognizedthata Catch22"iscreatedsince )$%  inordertoknowwhetherarguableissuesexistoutsidethenormalrecord,a +&' conscientiouscounselwouldneedtoseeatranscriptoftheproceedings;butinorderto  seeatranscriptofthoseproceedings,counselmustbeabletoallegethatarguableissues  exist.(Peoplev.Gaston,supra,20Cal.3datp.483,fn.7.)Therefore,theSupremeCourt  hasappliedthedoctrineofliberalconstructiontotheaugmentprocedureandcallsfor    freepermissiveuseoftheaugmentationprocedure.(Ibid.)     HereinformationwasprovidedthatappellanthadIndianheritageanddespitethe   factthatheandhismotherwerepresentincourtonnumerousoccasions,inadequate   informationwasprovidedinthenotices.Asaresult,thetribesdidnotrespondandthe  courtfoundthatthe_ICWA_Ԁdidnotapply.(2C.T.p.388.)Thusitisimperativethatthe  transcriptsofthoserelevanthearingsbemadepartoftherecordtoseewhetheradditional  informationwasprovidedorallyduringthehearingswhichisnotreflectedinthecurrent  record.Infact,itisincumbentuponappellatecounseltoobtainthismaterialinorderto  provideappellantwitheffectiveassistanceofcounselonappeal,asishisright.    In_In_Ԁre_L.B._(2003)110_Cal.App_.4th1420,theappellatecourtcriticizedthe  failureofappellatecounseltoprocurethereporter'stranscriptofahearingatwhich   relevantinformationabouttheminor'spossibleIndianheritagemayhavebeenpresented. " Thecourtstated,"Itisappellant'sresponsibilitytoprovidearecordthatisadequatefor $  appellatereviewoftheirclaims;astheyhavefailedtodoso,weareunabletofully &"" evaluatewhatmeasuresthejuvenilecourtmayhavetakeninregardtotheclaimed  ($$ errors."(Inre_L.B._,supra,110_Cal.App_.4thatp.1424.)Thecourtthenaffirmedthetrial  court's`action.(Id.atp.1427.)    II.  REQUESTFORANEXTENSIONOFTIMETOFILE   APPELLANTSOPENINGBRIEF    44  Appellantsopeningbriefiscurrentlydueon[DATE5].Appellantrespectfully   requestsanextensionoftimeof20daysfromthefilingoftheaugmentedrecordinwhich   tofiletheopeningbrief.Iagreethatanyadditionaltimegrantedmaybedeductedfrom   theperiodprovidedunderCaliforniaRulesofCourt,rules8.412(d)and8.416(f)and(g).     Nodetrimenttotheminorwillresultfromanextensionoftimesinceheis  currentlyplacedinrelativecarewithhisadoptivefamily.  Respectfullysubmitted,  Date:  0  0h(#(#0h(#h(#򀀀  @  @  @  @  @   [ATTORNEYNAME9]   x   @  @  @  @  @  @   AttorneyforAppellant(#(#