WPC  AXLD"i(Uy6Uiw i7 1|Pr#d^'bql6iQܠV!Eda3CP@I461385G0͉5@?. ..\J3ĤRB7;FXx;ƚ+E}R| x9!76^\n;X<ЀT0 &_ 28WpE6 /m# U4_ytxR^t 8aTy_Dh7+c2FMs}e!?l#U_(Z\A?wenjUk5c~ #HjR>S`wg"h[M ~>~+XAEy}kǟ}VtMS? 3b8zi4PGLJݎME}$(&>Y# % 0k 0P U:h UN 0U nE ^ w N 4  ' m) h@ U>E 0 0 0 0O 0 0 0h 0 0 0u 0F 0 0 0M 0 0 0 0 0m 0; 0 0 09 0 0o 0 0< B Brother MFC-6800 USB,,,,,,,,0X(C2}$ !   (($  <6X9`("Courier 10cpi(hH  Z6Times New Roman Regular*+ (_2623  ..<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXx6X@8;X@6< m5:i+003|xU FurnessZANGHI exts ADIColaneriTaghridBakeerOstioOdvenMineroTavaresCotlandStricklandD052232J516946D053013SJ11807AD053765NJ11133ALYSSAD054143 J516D054573J516256BSUSANASJ11646B J.F. R.T. CAMICal.AppWitkindispositional\  `&Times New Roman*G+G (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ../%` ` hp x /   *8+8 (_24  ," hp x ,23  ..," hp x ,  *5+5 (_23 ` ) hp x )23  ..) hp x ) ` *2+2 (_22  &hhp x &23  ..&hhp x &  */+/ (_21  #p x #23  ..#p x #  *,+, (_20 h  p x 23  .. p x h *)+) (_19  pp x 23  ..pp x   *&+& (_18   x 23  .. x   *AA (_17  5+ ` hp x 523  Ԁ5+ ` hp x 5  *GG (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ/%` ` hp x /   *88 (_15  ," hp x ,23  Ԁ," hp x ,  *55 (_14 ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ) hp x ) ` *22 (_13  &hhp x &23  Ԁ&hhp x &  *// (_12  #p x #23  Ԁ#p x #  *,, (_11 h  p x 23  Ԁ p x h *)) (_10  pp x 23  Ԁpp x   (&& &_9   x 23  Ԁ x   (AA &_8  5+ ` hp x 523  5+ ` hp x 5  (GG &_7   /%` ` hp x /23  /%` ` hp x /   (88 &_6  ," hp x ,23  ," hp x ,  (55 &_5 ` ) hp x )23  ) hp x ) ` (22 &_4  &hhp x &23  &hhp x &  (// &_3  #p x #23  #p x #  (,, &_2 h  p x 23   p x h ()) &_1  pp x 23  pp x   &&& $_   x 23   x   <:Default Para d !   _XAXXX:XXATRX3'X3' Letter3'Letter3'LetterT = 8YXXdd8  [ATTORNEYNAME,BAR#S]  [ATTORNEYFIRM]  [FIRMADDRESS]  [TELEPHONE1]  AttorneyforDefendantandAppellant   @ COURTOFAPPEALFORTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA   @V V FOURTHAPPELLATEDISTRICT    @"DIVISION[NUMBERd]     ::CSUS.,Inre[CHILDSINITIALS].,0 h   0h(#h(#)CourtofAppeal (#(# Ѐ `     h     )No.:[CASE#]     APerson[s]ComingUnderThe0  0(#(#)(#(#   JuvenileCourtLaw. h     )SuperiorCourtUS.,CS.,CSUS.,#::#::Ԁ    򀀀)No.:[CASE#]#::'#::US.,CS.,CSUS.,  [SPECIFICCOUNTY&AGENCYv0  0(#(#) (#(# TITLE US.,CS.,NCSUS.,#::#::]US.,CS.,] #:: #CSUS.,::,0 ` 0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#0(#(#) APPELLANTSUS.,CS., MOTIONTO#:: #::CSUS., (#(#   PlaintiffandRespondent, h     ) CONSOLIDATECASENUMBERS   v.   `     h     ) US.,CS., Ԁ[CASE#9 ]AND[CASE#j ]#:: #::;EXTENSION#:: #::CSUS.,     0 ` 0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#0(#(#) OFTIMETOFILEAPPELLANTS (#(# [PARENTSINITIALS](mother/fatherL),  ) OPENINGBRIEF   AX)3dE3A  DefendantandAppellant.#:: #::US.,CS.,$ CSUS.,0 h 0h(#h(#0(#(#) (#(#   #::D#US.,CS.,}::TO:THEHONORABLE[JUSTICEw],PRESIDINGJUSTICE,ANDASSOCIATE   JUSTICESOFTHEFOURTHDISTRICTCOURTOFAPPEAL,DIVISIONONE:#::3#     Appellant[mother/fatherg][PARENTSNAME&LASTINITIAL]CAMIC., "  movesthisCourtforanorderconsolidatingcasenumbers ::[CASE#Y] #::9#Ԁand ::[CASE#] #::#,now $  pendingbeforethisCourt.Thebasisforthismotionismoreparticularlysetforthinthe &"" attachedmemorandumofpointsandauthoritiesanddeclarationofappointedcounsel, ($$ [ATTORNEYNAME]. *&&  ,((=  ::  MEMORANDUMOFPOINTSANDAUTHORITIESIN  SUPPORTOFMOTIONTOCONSOLIDATE    I.  P-DL!X-QVTHEREVIEWINGCOURTHASINHERENTPOWERAND   B+ 4 <DL!DXBӀBOARDDISCRETIONTOCONSOLIDATEAPPEALS   ЀINVOLVINGCOMMONISSUESOFFACTORLAW. \     Thereisnoexpressruleofcourtgoverningapplicationstoconsolidateappeals.    However,CaliforniaRulesofCourt,rule8.147(b),referstouseofrecordsfromprior   appealsonsubsequentappealsinthesamecase,andhasbeeninterpretedinamanner   whichpromotesconsolidationofappeals,unlessitcanbeshownthatapartywouldbe  prejudicedbyconsolidation.(GeneralElec.Co.v.Fed.Etc.,DistributionCo.(1954)122  Cal.App.2d509,511.)  Witkinisinagreement:  8  Whereseparateactions,relatedinsubjectmatterandissuesareconsolidated  fortrial(seePleading,sec.298),orwhereactionsseparatelytriedare  neverthelesssorelated,theymayoftenprofitablybeconsideredtogetheron  appeal.Sofarasthereviewingcourtisconcerned,itmaywithoutorder  placethemonthecalendartogether,makeuseofbriefsandarguments  interchangeably,andwriteonlyonedetailedopinion,decidingtheother   casesontheauthorityofthefirst.(Seeinfra,sec.562.)Anorderof ! consolidation,however,goesfurther:Itallowsthepartiestoalltheappeals " toprepareasinglerecordandsetofbriefs.#   (9Witkin,CaliforniaProcedure(3dEd.,1985),Appeals,sec.359,ConsolidationofCases % ! onAppeal,pp.528529.) '"#   Rule8.50(d),CaliforniaRulesofCourt,affordstheChiefJusticeorpresiding )$% justiceto ruleontheapplication.Certainlyjudicialeconomy,aswellaspubliceconomy +&' (includingpaymentatpublicexpenseofappointedcounselsfeesforseveralversusa  singlebrief,aswellasthepublicexpenseoftherespondentgovernmentalentityin  opposingseveralbriefsversusasinglebrief)compelstheconclusionthatallinterests  wouldbebestservedbyanorderconsolidatingtheappealsinthisaction.Thus,   consolidationoftheappealsiswarrantedherein.      CONCLUSION    t   Forthereasonssetforthabove,andthoseincludedintheattacheddeclarationby   [ATTORNEYNAME&!],appellantrequeststhetwopendingappeals,casenumbers[CASE   #!]and[CASE#!]#::{#::,beconsolidatedforbriefinganddecision.#::'"#    DATE:򀀀  0 h 0h(#h(#򀀀(#(#    `     h   [ATTORNEYNAME#]     `     h   COUNSELFORAPPELLANT  "     DECLARATIONOF[ATTORNEYNAME$],Esq.   $  I,[ATTORNEYNAMEF%],declare:    1. ` OnMarch25,2003,Iwasappointedtorepresentappellant,MarilynC.,in  casenumber::[CASE#<&]#::&#.OnApril3,2003,Iwasappointedtorepresentthesame   appellantincasenumber::[CASE#']#::&#.Iamtheattorneyappointedinbothcases.     2. ` Therecordincasenumber::[CASE#']#::'#Ԁwasfiledpriortomyappointmentand   thiscourtextendedtheduedatetofileappellantsopeningbrieftoApril24,2003.     3. ` Therecordincasenumber::[CASE#C)]#::#)#Ԁwaslikewisefiledpriortomy   appointmentandthiscourtextendedtheduedatetofileappellantsopeningbrieftoMay  1,2003.    4. ` Bothappealsderivefromthesamedependencyproceedinginthesuperior  court,casenumber::[CASE#*]#::*#,involvingappellant'sdaughter,ElizabethC.Appellant  filedherfirstnoticeofappealonJanuary9,2003,withhernoticespecificallyappealing  fromtherulingsmadeatherdaughter'sjurisdictionalhearingthatconcludedon  December20,2002.(C.T.p.204;::[CASE#,]#::,#.)Appellantfiledhersecondnoticeofappeal   onFebruary5,2003,withhernoticespecificallystatingshewasappealingfromthe " rulingsmadeatherdaughter'sdispositionalhearingheldJanuary15,16,and17,2003. $  (C.T.p.9;::[CASE#E.]#::%.#.) &!"   5. ` Thelawisclearthatajurisdictionalfinding,whilenotappealable,maybe (#$ reviewedinanappealfromthedispositionalorder.(InreJamesJ.(1986)187Cal.App.3d *%& 1339,1342;InreMeganB.(1991)235Cal.App.3d942;InreRebekahR.(1994)27  Cal.App.4th1638.)Intheinstantcase,thejuvenilecourtadvisedappellantofher  appellaterightsattheendofherdaughter'sjurisdictionalhearingandappellantthenfiled  hernoticeofappeal.(C.T.p.204,259;7R.T.pp.856-857;::[CASE#E1]#::%1#.)Thecourt's   advisement,aswellasappellant'sresultantnoticeofappeal,werepremature.     6. ` Giventheselegalparametersandintheinterestsofjudicialeconomy,it   wouldservetheinterestsofallparties,includingtheCourt,ifbriefingwereconsolidated.     7. ` AppellantthereforerequeststheCourtconsolidatethetwocasesandgrant  anextensionoftimetofilethecombinedopeningbriefto30daysaftertheorder  consolidatingtheappealsismade.    IdeclareunderpenaltyofperjuryunderthelawsoftheStateofCaliforniathatthe  foregoingistrueandcorrect.  Executedat[CITYNAME4],California,on[DATE5].  0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#򀀀 (#(#    `     h   [ATTORNEYNAME6] !    `     h   COUNSELFORAPPELLANT " T5