WPCv sj^u<_Y]{w􇲁Nw*00\[9={_0'1^єN1+g5/rO0,CNgܙj"h 8ڝFBgQF$t W:=Mk Ա9ɑjӞ259ߔQ=Fz7ͦo72hp f>.^?J$Qh۰fV4VA񺣆Nۋ"@dۊ(˙rQ3BPM^$ԵA3$HRݠ5X|9Gw4lȯ@?pVZII ^OFApnOcI)X1 IeҢEn,x2#V1@_gEa4Gz,27Zpv%mdd;p+-tXNVF?A )Z$i9Oع&=0'pcef)+GHágbQ}1<(# U0Nq % 0c UN( U>v ^ w 4    E f ma------------------------------------------------------------------ B CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCf`abBrother MFC-7220 USB Printer,,,,0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX(;($w(Fa  Z6Times New Roman Regular(9 Z&Times New Roman&D?5 tB<:i+003|x   UTABLE A    dTABLE A (!XX  _     OaINTHECOURTOFAPPEALOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA  FOURTHAPPELLATEDISTRICT  DIVISION 0 @ _________   u*Uddd Xdd Xdd X  ,dd , dd +     THEPEOPLEOFTHESTATEOF  Z CALIFORNIA,  Z  PlaintiffandRespondent,  Z  vs.  Z  ̀,  Z  DefendantandAppellant.  Z  ,U Z ,CourtofAppeal  Z No.  Z  SuperiorCourt  Z  No.( Z  U (@*   APPEALFROMTHESUPERIORCOURTOF : ______________COUNTY  8 Honorable_____________________,Judge 6  ` AU ) dE 5A 6    APPELLANTSCONFIDENTIALEXPARTE E APPLICATIONFORAUTHORIZATIONOFEXPERTFEES C AND A  REQUESTTHATTHEAPPLICATIONANDALL ?! CORRESPONDINGORDERSANDDOCUMENTS =" PRODUCEDBEFILEDUNDERSEAL ; #  9 `     h   AU ) dE 8!A 9!$  `     h   Name H"& 0 ` 0 ` ` 0 0h  0h h StateBarNo.H#'    `     h   AttorneyatLaw H$( 0 ` 0 ` ` 0 0h  0h h AddressH% )   0 ` 0 ` ` 0 0h  0h h PhoneNumber0  H&!*   0 ` 0 ` ` 0      `     h   AttorneyforAppellant H(#,  `     h   UndertheAppellateDefenders,Inc. H)$-  `     h   Independent(orAssisted)CaseSystem H*%.  (See_ADI_ԀManual,Chapter8,PuttingontheWrits:California H,'0 ExtraordinaryRemedies,8.4.)# #Ԁ H-(1  # #   8XXdd8INTHECOURTOFAPPEALOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA  FOURTHAPPELLATEDISTRICT  DIVISION 0 @ _________    x  `     h *xUdddd  dd U  x,dd , dd +     THEPEOPLEOFTHESTATEOF  Z  CALIFORNIA,  Z  PlaintiffandRespondent,  Z  vs.  Z  ̀,  Z DefendantandAppellant.  Z  ,U Z ,CourtofAppeal  Z  No.  Z  SuperiorCourt  Z  No.( Z  U (@*  APPEALFROMTHESUPERIORCOURTOF : ______________COUNTY  8 Honorable_____________________,Judge 6 AU ) dE 5A 6  \  APPELLANTSCONFIDENTIALEXPARTE E APPLICATIONFORAUTHORIZATIONOFEXPERTFEES C  AND A! REQUESTTHATTHEAPPLICATIONANDALL ?" CORRESPONDINGORDERSANDDOCUMENTS = # PRODUCEDBEFILEDUNDERSEAL ;!$  t `     h   AU ) dE 8"A 9"%  ` TOTHEHONORABLE_____________,PRESIDING H#' JUSTICE,ANDTHEHONORABLEASSOCIATEJUSTICESOF F$( THECOURTOFAPPEAL,FOURTHAPPELLATEDISTRICT, D% ) DIVISION________: B&!*   ` #Z#Pursuanttorules8.50[applications]and8.54(a)[motions],ofthe @(#, CaliforniaRulesofCourt,##appellant,_______________,#s#requeststhatthis @*%. Oa    courtauthorizeandreimbursetheexpenditureofexpertfeesuptoand  including$__________inorderto(brieflysetforthwhattheservices  involveandwhytheservicesarereasonablynecessary).##Ԁ   ` PursuanttoCaliforniaRulesofCourt,rules8.46(e)(1)[applicationto   fileunderseal]and#l#_Corenevsky_Ԁv.SuperiorCourt(1984)36Cal.3d307,   320,fn.12,appellantfurtherrequeststhat(1)thisapplicationbefiledunder   sealand(2)allordersmade,andallotherdocumentsproducedorfiledin   connectionwiththisapplicationbesealedandservedonlyuponcounselfor  appellant,withtheexceptionofordersclearlycontainingnoprivileged  informationandnoinformationwhichcouldleadtothediscoveryof  privilegedinformation,orotherwiselightentheburdenoftheprosecutionin  violationofappellantsprivilegeagainstselfincrimination##.   ` #l#Lastly,appellantrequeststhatthisapplicationbedeemedtobe  withdrawninitsentiretyifthiscourtdeclinestograntappellantsrequest  forconfidentialityand,insuchevent,thatthecourtreturntoappellants   counselallcopiesoftheapplicationandrequest. "  ` Theapplicationandrequestarebasedupontherecordinthisappeal $  andtheattacheddeclarationofappellatecounsel. &"" ##Dated:0 0  h   Respectfullysubmitted,($$    `     h   AttorneyforAppellantandDefendant *&& #$#   STATEMENTOFCASEANDFACTS  @h   q(Setforthprocedureandfactswithcitationstotherecordanddeclarationof  appellatecounselwhicharerelevanttotheissuethatisbeinginvestigated.)   *%& #R#   I   0 ` THISCOURTISSTATUTORILYӀAND  CONSTITUTIONALLYOBLIGATEDTOPROVIDE` `  0 ` FUNDSFORANCILLARYDEFENSESERVICES,  INCLUDINGEXPERTFEES,NEEDEDTOENSURE   EFFECTIVELEGALREPRESENTATION. ` `    ` PenalCodesection1241provides,inpart:   8 ` Inanycaseinwhichcounselotherthanapublicdefenderhas   beenappointedbytheSupremeCourtorbyacourtofappeal   torepresentapartytoanyappealorproceeding,suchcounsel   shallreceiveareasonablesumforcompensationand   necessaryexpenses,theamountofwhichshallbedetermined   bythecourtandpaidfromanyfundsappropriatedtothe  JudicialCouncilforthatpurpose.` x` x  ` ThelanguageofthisstatuteisverysimilartothatofPenalCode  section987.2,subdivision(a),whichprovidesthatcounselotherthanthe  publicdefenderappointedtorepresentadefendantinthemunicipalor  superiorcourt shallreceiveareasonablesumforcompensationandfor  necessaryexpenses,theamountofwhichshallbedeterminedbythecourt,  tobepaidoutofthegeneralfundofthecounty[.]    ` TheCaliforniaSupremeCourthasheldthatPenalCodesections " 987and987.8implythatindigentdefendantshavetherighttocourt $  ordereddefenseservices,includingexpertsandinvestigators.(_Corenevsky_ &!" v.SuperiorCourt,supra,36Cal.3d307,319:Sandv.SuperiorCourt (#$ (1983)34Cal.3d567,575.)PenalCodesection987.8,subdivision(g)(1), *%& definesthe legalassistancefurnishedbycourtstoindigentdefendantsas   legalcounselandsupportiveservicesincluding,butnotlimitedto,medical  andpsychiatricexaminations,investigativeservices,experttestimony,or  anyotherformofservicesprovidedtoassistthedefendantinthe   preparationandpresentationofthedefendantscase.    ` Moreover,boththeCaliforniaSupremeCourtandtheUnitedStates   SupremeCourthaverecognizedthatindigentdefendantshaveadueprocess   rightto thebasictoolsofanadequatedefense,(_Ake_Ԁv.Oklahoma(1985)  470U.S.68,77[105_S.Ct_.1087,84_L.Ed_.2d53],citationomitted),  # #includingnotonlycounsel,butexpertandotherservicesasneeded.(Ibid.;  seealsoid.atpp.7683;_Corenevsky_Ԁv.SuperiorCourt,supra,#-#Ԁ36Cal.3dat  pp.319320.)TheCaliforniaSupremeCourthasstatedin_Corenevsky_Ԁand  othercasesthatadefendantsconstitutionalrighttoeffectivecounselunder  boththestateandfederalconstitutionsalsoincludestherighttoreasonably  necessaryancillarydefenseservices.(U.S.Const.,Amends.VIandXIV;   Cal.Const.,art.I,15;_Corenevsky_Ԁv.SuperiorCourt,supra,#4.#Ԁatp.319#0#; " Keenanv.SuperiorCourt,supra,31Cal.3datp.428;Masonv.Stateof $  Arizona(9thCir.1974)504F.2d1345,1351.) &""  ` TheCaliforniaSupremeCourthasalsoheldthattheconstitutional ($$ righttoancillaryservicesextendstodefendantsappealingtheirconvictions. *&& _(InreKetchel(1968)68Cal.2d397,401402[couldassistappellate  counselinoverallstrategy;couldaidindeterminingwhetherthedefendant  wasadequatelyrepresentedbytrialcounsel].)  Ѐ0 ` Theimportanceofinvestigationindevelopingtheevidencewhich, ` `  forexample,ahabeascorpuspetitionerneedstoprevailonhisclaimsis   illustratedinvariouscasesinwhichhabeascorpusreliefhasbeengranted   toconvicteddefendantsonthestrengthofevidencedevelopedby   investigationaftertrial.(SeeInreCordero(1988)46Cal.3d161;Inre  Ledesma(1986)43Cal.3d171;InreHall(1981)30Cal.3d408;Usherv.  Ercole(E.D.N.Y.2010)710F.Supp.2d287.)   ` Undertheseprinciples,itisclearthatacourtwhichmayappoint  counseltorepresentapetitionerinhabeascorpusproceedingsundertakes  theresponsibilitytoprovideancillaryservices,includingexpertsand  investigators,neededtomakesuchrepresentationeffective.Appointingan  attorneywithoutprovidingthatattorneywiththemeansofraisinga   successfulhabeascorpusclaimmakestheappointmentoneofformwithout " substance,givingtheclientthesurfaceappearanceofrepresentation $  withoutprovidinghiscounsel accesstotherawmaterialsintegraltothe &"" buildingofaneffectivedefense.(Akev.Oklahoma,supra,470U.S.atp. ($$ _77.) *&&  ` Hence,thecourthasastatutoryandconstitutionaldutytoprovide  fundsforancillarydefenseservices.   ` #0# @}})II.    8 ` SERVICESAREREASONABLYNECESSARYTO   INVESTIGATEANDEXAMINETHEISSUEOF   WHETHER_______________________________________ ` x` x  #:#: ` Thedefendanthastheburdenofshowinginhisrequestthattheservices   are#<#  reasonablynecessarybyreferencetothegenerallinesofinquiry[tobe]   _pursue[d_],beingasspecificaspossible.(_Corenevsky_Ԁv.SuperiorCourt,   supra,36Cal.3datp.320.#<#)#0>#ԀHowever,ithasbeen recognizedthatbecauseof  theearlystageatwhichtherequesttypicallyarises,itwilloftenbedifficultfor  counseltodemonstrateaclearneedforsuchfunds.(Ibid.;seealsoInre  _Ketchel_,supra,68Cal.2datp.402[ Therighttosuchaidshouldhardlybe  conditioneduponashowingofitspreciseapplicationorutility].)Therefore,   inappropriatecircumstances,[therequestshouldbe]_view[ed_]with  considerableliberality.(#t>#_Corenevsky_Ԁv.SuperiorCourt,supra#lA#,atp.320,   quotingMasonv.StateofArizona,supra,504F.2datp.1352.) "  ` (Describetheissuethatisbeinginvestigatedandexamined,thereason $  forthefeerequest,thenameoftheexpert,andthecostestimatesobtainedand &!" citetothedeclarationofappellatecounselinsupport.) (#$ #A#Ԁ0 ` Forthesereasons,inordertoassurethatpotentialissuesinappellants*%&` `  _casearefullyexploredandraised,fundsshouldbeauthorizedtoinvestigate  theaboveclaim.  #C#:   III.  mE0 ` THECIRCUMSTANCESWARRANTTHATTHIS ` `  0 ` APPLICATIONANDALLCORRESPONDINGORDERS ` `  0 ` ANDALLDOCUMENTSPRODUCEDBESEALED. ` `  E ` #KE#Toprotecttheconfidentialityofthefactualinformationcontainedin   thisapplicationandthedeclarationsubmittedherewith,whichisbasedon   (e.g.,attorneyworkproduct),appellantrequeststhatthisapplicationand   declarationbefiledundersealandheardwithoutserviceupontheother  partiestothisproceeding.(SeeCal.RulesofCourt,rule8.46(e)  [applicationstofileundersealaccompaniedbydeclarationcontainingfacts  sufficienttojustifysealing]and#F#Corenevskyv.SuperiorCourt,supra,36  Cal.3d307,320,fn.12[courtrejectedsuggestionthatthegovernmentmay  bepresentatahearingonsuchrequests,notingthatsuchaprocedure   wouldcreateunnecessaryconflictsofinterestand cannotbepermitted   becausesuchpetitionsareentitledtobeconfidential];seealso#I#Keenanv. " SuperiorCourt(1982)31Cal.3d424,#|K#430;#L#Peoplev.Worthy(1980)109 $  Cal.App.3d514,522,fn.2;#UL#Puettv.SuperiorCourt(1979)96Cal.App.3d &!"  936,940,fn.2.#L#;#M#Peoplev.Faxel(1979)91Cal.App.3d327,330,fn.1.)#M##KN# (#$ #N#  ` #N#Additionally,herequeststhatallordersmade,andallother   documentsproducedorfiledinconnectionwiththisapplicationbesealed  andservedonlyuponcounselforappellant,withtheexceptionoforders  clearlycontainingnoprivilegedinformationandnoinformationwhich   couldleadtothediscoveryofprivilegedinformation,orotherwiselighten   theburdenoftheprosecutioninviolationofappellantsprivilegeagainst   selfincrimination.#EO#Ԁ    ` (Setforththegroundsthatsupportsealing,suchasattorneywork  product,andcitetothedeclarationofappellatecounsel.)  #Q# ` Forthesereasons,theapplicationandallordersanddocuments  producedasaresultshouldbeorderedsealed.   ` #R# Intheeventthiscourtdeclinestograntappellantsrequestfor  confidentiality,appellantrequeststhatthisapplicationbedeemedtobe  withdrawninitsentiretyand,insuchevent,thatthecourtreturnto  appellantscounselallcopiesofthisapplication.   #S# m  *%& @% CONCLUSION    ` Fortheforegoingreasons,appellantsrequestfor#qU#Ԁauthorizationand  reimbursementoftheexpenditureofexpertfeesuptoandincluding  $__________#\V#shouldbegranted,andtheapplicationandordersanddocuments   producedbesealed.   Dated:    h   Respectfullysubmitted,    `     h       `     h   AttorneyforAppellantand_Defendant   U  DECLARATIONOFCOUNSEL   (X @`  @  @  @h  @   @@!!" 򀀀     P#?Z##)W#  ATTACHPROOFOFSERVICE   `YIfthemotionisbeingfiledconfidentially,noproofofserviceis_needed.   `     h      p _