WPCx kӰhUӉ3t 41x6)[r5ӣc$Du,h Phd:Ꮨ1qb PÑGд!BőB8@\fqM8М(qfJѦ0ѓh/=\;_WNN>esz/LuY,<|AO_úu `$97N\ c ΐPLY"hWA S 5I:e>dH*.PZ!#S+#:f/DF?kZZxB)! MVFQ1?B6kھ661o,Yϯ}(aF%0PW5%D }*]C?u|>w^e1 6;t-0. =E |8P"V/fl^5ZEd^O[!H42 Ӣy# U.Nq % 0c UN( U>v ^ w 4    E f mNa////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// B EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEfbadBrother MFC-6800 USB,,,,,,,,0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX(;($w(Fa  Z6Times New Roman Regular(9 Z&Times New Romani= m5ebsite3|x   UTABLE A    dTABLE A (!ţXX  _e     OaINTHECOURTOFAPPEALOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA e FOURTHAPPELLATEDISTRICT a DIVISION 0 @ _________  ] *Uddd Xdd Xdd X  ,dd , dd +  [ [  THEPEOPLEOFTHESTATEOF  Z CALIFORNIA,  Z  PlaintiffandRespondent,  Z  vs. Z  ̀, Z  DefendantandAppellant. Z  ,UZ ,CourtofAppeal  Z No.  Z  SuperiorCourt Z  No.(Z  U (@*   APPEALFROMTHESUPERIORCOURTOF  ______________COUNTY   Honorable_____________________,Judge  & ` AU ) dE A     APPELLANTSCONFIDENTIALEXPARTE  APPLICATIONFORAUTHORIZATIONOFEXPERTFEES  AND   REQUESTTHATTHEAPPLICATIONANDALL ! CORRESPONDINGORDERSANDDOCUMENTS " PRODUCEDBEFILEDUNDERSEAL #  G `     h   AU ) dE A  $  `     h   Name !& 0 ` 0 ` ` 0 0h  0h h StateBarNo."'    `     h   AttorneyatLaw #( 0 ` 0 ` ` 0 0h  0h h Address$ )   0 ` 0 ` ` 0 0h  0h h PhoneNumber0  %!*   0 ` 0 ` ` 0      `     h   AttorneyforAppellant '#,  `     h   UndertheAppellateDefenders,Inc. ($-  `     h   Independent(orAssisted)CaseSystem )%.  ţţ(See_ADI_ԀManual,Chapter8,PuttingontheWrits:California +'0 ExtraordinaryRemedies,8.4.)#ţţ, #ţţԀ ,(1 " #ţţ #   8XXdd8INTHECOURTOFAPPEALOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA e FOURTHAPPELLATEDISTRICT a DIVISION 0 @ _________  ]    `     h *xUdddd  dd U  x,dd , dd +  [ [  THEPEOPLEOFTHESTATEOF  Z  CALIFORNIA,  Z  PlaintiffandRespondent, Z  vs. Z  ̀, Z DefendantandAppellant. Z  ,UZ ,CourtofAppeal  Z  No. Z  SuperiorCourt Z  No.(Z  U (@*  APPEALFROMTHESUPERIORCOURTOF  ______________COUNTY   Honorable_____________________,Judge  AU ) dE A   j  APPELLANTSCONFIDENTIALEXPARTE  APPLICATIONFORAUTHORIZATIONOFEXPERTFEES   AND ! REQUESTTHATTHEAPPLICATIONANDALL " CORRESPONDINGORDERSANDDOCUMENTS # PRODUCEDBEFILEDUNDERSEAL  $   `     h   AU ) dE !A !%  ` TOTHEHONORABLE_____________,PRESIDING "' JUSTICE,ANDTHEHONORABLEASSOCIATEJUSTICESOF #( THECOURTOFAPPEAL,FOURTHAPPELLATEDISTRICT, $ ) DIVISION________: %!* ţţ  ` #ţţh#ţţPursuanttorules8.50[applications]and8.54(a)[motions],ofthe '#, CaliforniaRulesofCourt,#ţţ#ţţappellant,_______________,#ţţ#ţţrequeststhatthis )%. courtauthorizeandreimbursetheexpenditureofexpertfeesuptoand +'0 Oa    including$__________inorderto(brieflysetforthwhattheservices e involveandwhytheservicesarereasonablynecessary).#ţţ#ţţԀ e  ` PursuanttoCaliforniaRulesofCourt,rules8.46(e)(1)[applicationto e fileunderseal]and#ţţz#_Corenevsky_Ԁv.SuperiorCourt(1984)36Cal.3d307, e  320,fn.12ţţ,appellantfurtherrequeststhat(1)thisapplicationbefiledunder e  sealand(2)allordersmade,andallotherdocumentsproducedorfiledin e  connectionwiththisapplicationbesealedandservedonlyuponcounselfor e  appellant,withtheexceptionofordersclearlycontainingnoprivileged e informationandnoinformationwhichcouldleadtothediscoveryof e privilegedinformation,orotherwiselightentheburdenoftheprosecutionin e violationofappellantsprivilegeagainstselfincrimination#ţţ#ţţ. e  ` #ţţz#ţţLastly,appellantrequeststhatthisapplicationbedeemedtobe e withdrawninitsentiretyifthiscourtdeclinestograntappellantsrequest e forconfidentialityand,insuchevent,thatthecourtreturntoappellants e counselallcopiesoftheapplicationandrequest. e   ` Theapplicationandrequestarebasedupontherecordinthisappeal e" andtheattacheddeclarationofappellatecounsel. e$  #ţţ#ţţDated:0 0  h   Respectfullysubmitted,e&""    `     h    `     h    e*&&  `     h   AttorneyforAppellantandDefendant#ţţ2# e+'' Ї ţţ  STATEMENTOFCASEANDFACTS  @h  e v (Setforthprocedureandfactswithcitationstotherecordanddeclarationof a appellatecounselwhicharerelevanttotheissuethatisbeinginvestigated.) a  `     h      p    a*%& #ţţW # ţţ  I e b"0 ` THISCOURTISSTATUTORILYӀAND a CONSTITUTIONALLYOBLIGATEDTOPROVIDE_` `  0 ` FUNDSFORANCILLARYDEFENSESERVICES, ] INCLUDINGEXPERTFEES,NEEDEDTOENSURE [  EFFECTIVELEGALREPRESENTATION.Y ` `    ` PenalCodesection1241provides,inpart: W  8 ` Inanycaseinwhichcounselotherthanapublicdefenderhas W  beenappointedbytheSupremeCourtorbyacourtofappeal W  torepresentapartytoanyappealorproceeding,suchcounsel W  shallreceiveareasonablesumforcompensationand W  necessaryexpenses,theamountofwhichshallbedetermined W  bythecourtandpaidfromanyfundsappropriatedtothe W JudicialCouncilforthatpurpose.W` x` x  ` ThelanguageofthisstatuteisverysimilartothatofPenalCode W section987.2,subdivision(a),whichprovidesthatcounselotherthanthe W publicdefenderappointedtorepresentadefendantinthemunicipalor W superiorcourt shallreceiveareasonablesumforcompensationandfor W necessaryexpenses,theamountofwhichshallbedeterminedbythecourt, W tobepaidoutofthegeneralfundofthecounty[.] W   ` TheCaliforniaSupremeCourthasheldthatPenalCodesections W" 987and987.8implythatindigentdefendantshavetherighttocourt W$  ordereddefenseservices,includingexpertsandinvestigators.(_Corenevsky_ W&!" v.SuperiorCourt,supra,36Cal.3d307,319:Sandv.SuperiorCourt W(#$ (1983)34Cal.3d567,575.)PenalCodesection987.8,subdivision(g)(1), W*%& definesthe legalassistancefurnishedbycourtstoindigentdefendantsas e  legalcounselandsupportiveservicesincluding,butnotlimitedto,medical e andpsychiatricexaminations,investigativeservices,experttestimony,or e anyotherformofservicesprovidedtoassistthedefendantinthe e  preparationandpresentationofthedefendantscase. e   ` Moreover,boththeCaliforniaSupremeCourtandtheUnitedStates e  SupremeCourthaverecognizedthatindigentdefendantshaveadueprocess e  rightto thebasictoolsofanadequatedefense,(_Ake_Ԁv.Oklahoma(1985) e 470U.S.68,77[105_S.Ct_.1087,84_L.Ed_.2d53],citationomitted), e #ţţC"#ţţincludingnotonlycounsel,butexpertandotherservicesasneeded.(Ibid.; e seealsoid.atpp.7683;_Corenevsky_Ԁv.SuperiorCourt,supra,#ţţ.#ţţԀ36Cal.3dat e pp.319320.)TheCaliforniaSupremeCourthasstatedin_Corenevsky_Ԁand e othercasesthatadefendantsconstitutionalrighttoeffectivecounselunder e boththestateandfederalconstitutionsalsoincludestherighttoreasonably e necessaryancillarydefenseservices.(U.S.Const.,Amends.VIandXIV; e  Cal.Const.,art.I,15;_Corenevsky_Ԁv.SuperiorCourt,supra,#ţţ/#ţţԀatp.319#ţţ2#ţţ; e" Keenanv.SuperiorCourt,supra,31Cal.3datp.428;Masonv.Stateof e$  Arizona(9thCir.1974)504F.2d1345,1351.) e&""  ` TheCaliforniaSupremeCourthasalsoheldthattheconstitutional e($$ righttoancillaryservicesextendstodefendantsappealingtheirconvictions. e*&& (Inre_Ketchel_(1968)68Cal.2d397,401402[couldassistappellate e counselinoverallstrategy;couldaidindeterminingwhetherthedefendant e wasadequatelyrepresentedbytrialcounsel].) e Ѐ0 ` Theimportanceofinvestigationindevelopingtheevidencewhich,e ` `  forexample,ahabeascorpuspetitionerneedstoprevailonhisclaimsis e  illustratedinvariouscasesinwhichhabeascorpusreliefhasbeengranted e  toconvicteddefendantsonthestrengthofevidencedevelopedby e  investigationaftertrial.(SeeInre_Cordero_(1988)46Cal.3d161;Inre e _Ledesma_Ԁ(1986)43Cal.3d171;InreHall(1981)30Cal.3d408;Usherv. e _Ercole_Ԁ(_E.D.N.Y._Ԁ2010)____F.Supp.2d____[2010WL1813779].) e  ` Undertheseprinciples,itisclearthatacourtwhichmayappoint e counseltorepresentapetitionerinhabeascorpusproceedingsundertakes e theresponsibilitytoprovideancillaryservices,includingexpertsand e investigators,neededtomakesuchrepresentationeffective.Appointingan e attorneywithoutprovidingthatattorneywiththemeansofraisinga e  successfulhabeascorpusclaimmakestheappointmentoneofformwithout e" substance,givingtheclientthesurfaceappearanceofrepresentation e$  withoutprovidinghiscounsel accesstotherawmaterialsintegraltothe e&"" buildingofaneffectivedefense.(_Ake_Ԁv.Oklahoma,supra,470U.S.atp. e($$ 77.) e*&&  ` Hence,thecourthasastatutoryandconstitutionaldutytoprovide e fundsforancillarydefenseservices. e  ` #ţţZ2#ţţ @}})II. e   8 ` SERVICEAREREASONABLYNECESSARYTO a  INVESTIGATEANDEXAMINETHEISSUEOF _  WHETHER_______________________________________] ` x` x  #ţţ<#=ţţ ` Thedefendanthastheburdenofshowinginhisrequestthattheservices Y  are#ţţ'># ţţ reasonablynecessarybyreferencetothegenerallinesofinquiry[tobe] Y  _pursue[d_],beingasspecificaspossible.(_Corenevsky_Ԁv.SuperiorCourt, Y  supra,36Cal.3datp.320.#ţţ>#ţţ)#ţţI@#ţţԀHowever,ithasbeen recognizedthatbecauseof Y theearlystageatwhichtherequesttypicallyarises,itwilloftenbedifficultfor Y counseltodemonstrateaclearneedforsuchfunds.(Ibid.;seealsoInre Y _Ketchel_,supra,68Cal.2datp.402[ Therighttosuchaidshouldhardlybe Y conditioneduponashowingofitspreciseapplicationorutility].)Therefore, Y  inappropriatecircumstances,[therequestshouldbe]_view[ed_]with Y considerableliberality.(#ţţ@#ţţ_Corenevsky_Ԁv.SuperiorCourt,supra#ţţC#ţţ,atp.320, Y  quotingMasonv.StateofArizona,supra,504F.2datp.1352.) Y"  ` (Describetheissuethatisbeinginvestigatedandexamined,thereason Y$  forthefeerequest,thenameoftheexpert,andthecostestimatesobtainedand Y&!" citetothedeclarationofappellatecounselinsupport.) Y(#$ #ţţD#ţţԀ0 ` Forthesereasons,inordertoassurethatpotentialissuesinappellantsY*%&` `  casearefullyexploredandraised,fundsshouldbeauthorizedtoinvestigate e theaboveclaim. e #ţţF#=ţţ   III. e vG0 ` THECIRCUMSTANCESWARRANTTHATTHISa ` `  0 ` APPLICATIONANDALLCORRESPONDINGORDERS_ ` `  0 ` ANDALLDOCUMENTSPRODUCEDBESEALED.] ` `  G ` #ţţTG#ţţToprotecttheconfidentialityofthefactualinformationcontainedin Y  thisapplicationandthedeclarationsubmittedherewith,whichisbasedon Y  (e.g.,attorneyworkproduct),appellantrequeststhatthisapplicationand Y  declarationbefiledundersealandheardwithoutserviceupontheother Y partiestothisproceeding.(SeeCal.RulesofCourt,rule8.46(e) Y [applicationstofileundersealaccompaniedbydeclarationcontainingfacts Y sufficienttojustifysealing]and#ţţH#ţţ_Corenevsky_Ԁv.SuperiorCourt,supra,36 Y Cal.3d307,320,fn.12[courtrejectedsuggestionthatthegovernmentmay Y bepresentatahearingonsuchrequests,notingthatsuchaprocedure Y  wouldcreateunnecessaryconflictsofinterestand cannotbepermitted Y  becausesuchpetitionsareentitledtobeconfidential];seealso#ţţK#ţţKeenanv. Y" SuperiorCourt(1982)31Cal.3d424,#ţţM#ţţ430;#ţţ.N#ţţPeoplev.Worthy(1980)109 Y$  _Cal.App_.3d514,522,fn.2;#ţţ~N#ţţ_Puett_Ԁv.SuperiorCourt(1979)96_Cal.App_.3d Y&!"  936,940,fn.2.#ţţ.O#ţţ;#ţţP#ţţPeoplev._Faxel_Ԁ(1979)91_Cal.App_.3d327,330,fn.1.)#ţţYP#ţţ#ţţQ#ţţ Y(#$ #ţţcQ#ţţ  ` #ţţQ#ţţAdditionally,herequeststhatallordersmade,andallother e  documentsproducedorfiledinconnectionwiththisapplicationbesealed e andservedonlyuponcounselforappellant,withtheexceptionoforders e clearlycontainingnoprivilegedinformationandnoinformationwhich e  couldleadtothediscoveryofprivilegedinformation,orotherwiselighten e  theburdenoftheprosecutioninviolationofappellantsprivilegeagainst e  selfincrimination.#ţţR#ţţԀ e   ` (Setforththegroundsthatsupportsealing,suchasattorneywork e product,andcitetothedeclarationofappellatecounsel.) e #ţţT#ţţ ` Forthesereasons,theapplicationandallordersanddocuments e producedasaresultshouldbeorderedsealed. e  ` #ţţU# ţţIntheeventthiscourtdeclinestograntappellantsrequestfor e confidentiality,appellantrequeststhatthisapplicationbedeemedtobe e withdrawninitsentiretyand,insuchevent,thatthecourtreturnto e appellantscounselallcopiesofthisapplication. e  #ţţV# m  a*%& @% CONCLUSION  e  ` Fortheforegoingreasons,appellantsrequestforauthorizationand a reimbursementoftheexpenditureofexpertfeesuptoandincluding a $__________ţţshouldbegranted,andtheapplicationandordersanddocuments a  producedbesealed. a  Dated:    h   Respectfullysubmitted, a   `     h    a   `     h   AttorneyforAppellantandDefendant  a >X  DECLARATIONOFCOUNSEL  e lZ @`  @  @  @h  @  c @@!!" 򀀀 ţ  c  P#ţs\##ţţmY#  ATTACHPROOFOFSERVICE  e [